September 2010
| M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
| « Apr |
|
|
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
|
Site Navigation
Photo and Images
Projects
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
|
Posted on April 22nd, 2009 in Technology by Greg
In my job as a product manager one of my key responsibilities is designing high-productivity software that is easy to use and powerful. We work in a complex domain that involves massive amount of data, millions of dollars on the line, and tight deadlines. We attack these complex software with advanced technology, masked in easy to use software.
One of the challenges with user interface development – and all software development, for that matter – is that the further down the line in development something goes, the harder it is to change. Once a developer spends days or weeks working on something the resistance becomes huge as people are attached to their work – regardless of whether it is a good fit for the customer. To counter these problems, I’m a big advocate of building mockups in order to sort out the key design issues before significant development happens.
Over the years, I’ve used the following types of tools to do this:
- Whiteboards with digital camera snapshots
- Pen and paper sketches scanned
- Photoshop / image mockups
- HTML mockups
-
- PHP prototypes
I use these various tools to build mockups for a variety of applications including native windows applications, classical web applications, and dynamic ajax applications. The more complex applications become, with complex widgets such as data grids, trees, and tabs, the tougher the hurdles are to crank out a quick mockup. The other problem I’ve seen is that the closer to ‘real’ a mockup looks, the more people are going to comment on the nitty gritty details instead of focusing on the key issues of workflow and usability – just like the problem of developers getting attached to something they’ve worked on, reviewers of super realistic models seem to often just assume that they can’t question the general structure and end up commenting on alignment issues, colors, etc.
I’m always on the prowl for new tools to use in this design phase, and have recently come across a product that is becoming a great addition to my arsenal of tools: Balsamiq Mockups. Balsamiq is a lightweight tool for building wireframes/mockups that look like sketches. The focus is on rapid creation of screen mockups that are easy to make and easy to change, encouraging feedback and rapid iteration. The product is available in a desktop version and also version integrated with Wiki software like Confluence. For the past few weeks I’ve been playing around with the desktop version – their website said that they’d give a free license of the desktop version if you promised to write a review, so here I am! Here I’d like to point out some of my likes, some annoyances, some features I’d like to see, and a weird little bug I came across.
First off, here’s a sample of what a mockup looks like for a fictional, non-sense product:

In a way, Balsamiq seems to be very much inspired by Microsoft PowerPoint…but in a good way. You drag shapes from a list of about 75 widgets onto a page and then rearrange, align, and change properties for the items. The big difference is in the different types of widgets that are available. There are some basic shapes, but most of the widgets are things you would see in applications, like text inputs, dropdowns, radio/checkboxes, and then some more complex widgets like tabs, trees, data grids, and iPhone widgets. The result is that you can build things fast – the mockup above took about 5 minutes to put together.
What I like
- Easy to use – the number one feature. As mentioned, the application uses many known paradigms from existing applications such as PowerPoint and other design apps. I was able to get going without reading the manual, going through a tutorial, or getting a lesson – the application explains itself.
- Fast – ok, this is tied for the number one feature. Because of its ease of use, it is possible to create and iterate on designs very quickly. The ‘Quick Add’ feature really speeds things up by letting you type in the name of a widget without having to find it in the mix of 75 widgets – conveniences like this can make a massive difference in productivity.
- Just the right level of realism – the mockups definitely would never be confused with a real application, but they are clean enough that they can convey to point very well and get people to focus on the key design and workflow issues early on in product design and development
- Advanced widgets such as tree and data table – these advanced widgets are some of the items that make it tough to build mockups for advanced apps in languages like HTML without investing a lot of effort to use libraries like extjs, jquery, or YUI.
- Easy to export to PNG – mockups can easily be exported out to the PNG format for posting on a wiki or emailing.
- Editable – as compared to paper mockups, these have the major advantage of being editable, so you don’t have to break out the eraser or start over from scratch.
- Translates well to traditional webapps, ajax webapps, and desktop applications – because the application
Annoyances…or things that aren’t necessarily bugs, but would make the application easier to use if they were addressed
- After ‘Quick Add’ clicking f2 doesn’t go into edit mode – you have to click the widget first. If you drag items from the strip they automatically go into edit mode, it would be nice to have that for the quick add as well.
- Dragging items from the strip doesn’t show the guides unless you place the widget then drag again, whereas normally when you are dragging you see guides to help you line up widgets
- It would be nice if there were a better way to select a set of items without moving the item beneath it. If you have 20 widgets on a dialog box and you need to shift them over to make space, in order to select them all you have to first lock the dialog box, select the items by click dragging, drag, release, and unlock the dialog. If you don’t do this then the dialog box will just be moved. This gets more confusing if you have multiple boxes on top of each other. It would be nice if there were a way to move into selection mode which would allow you to select any elements that are entirely enclosed by a bounding box.
- Related to the previous entry, you unlock items through a right-click menu (the only usage of right-click in the app?), but if multiple items are locked in the clicked area it just shows the item type in the context menu. In some scenarios I had 3 or 4 items showing up, some of which were of the same type. It would be nice to highlight the item when hovering over it in the context menu to let you know you’ve got the right one.
- It would be nice if the tree could user smaller fonts – some of the other widgets allow for choosing smaller fonts to fit more text, but the tree uses a very large font, making it tough to represent even remotely realistic data.
Features I’d like to see
- Ability to click through from one mockup to another to create workflow – while I don’t need to create an entire flow for an application, if I’m mocking up a particular feature it would be useful to show 3 or 4 screens that are linked together maybe with a generated HTML files or something of the sort.
- Ability to regroup after ungrouping items – you can group items, but you need to ungroup to make any edits (unlike PowerPoint which allows you to change text or even move sub-items), but then you don’t have an option to regroup…meaning you have to go through the same fun of locking outer elements, and reselecting.
- Radio and Check Box controls should allow adding multiple at once similar to Dropdown – since these fields usually come with multiple entries it would be nice to have the widgets allow for adding multiple ‘rows’ of data similar to dropdowns
- It would be nice to have right-click context menus for some operations like grouping or ungrouping
- Layers – it might be nice to have layers (like Photoshop) to help avoid some of the issues with moving items…this would add a lot of utility but it would come with the negative impact on ease of use and ramp up time.
- Ability to add custom widgets – it would be nice to be able to add custom widgets…now if you create a widget by composing the built in widgets you have to save it as another mockup and then select-all and copy/paste into the destination mockup – it would be nice to be able to save the widget to the strip and give it a name.
- Favorites bar in addition to the current ‘All’, ‘Big’, ‘Buttons’ – for many projects only a small number of the widgets are necessary. In my applications I have no need for things like the iPhone widgets so they just get in the way.
- Maybe a way to switch from click mode to select mode for selecting multiple items
Bug
- This was a weird one. If you type ’scro’ into the Quick Add box and click the entry for the ‘vertical scrollbar’, the horizontal scrollbar is actually added. Surprisingly, if you type in ’scrol’ or ’scr’ it works just fine!
Conclusion
Overall I really like this application – I’ve found myself evangelizing to colleagues and used it for some real feature design and have gotten good feedback from all who have seen the results. Like all software, there are many things that could be improved and there likely always will be, but it seems that the application is in active development and the focus on usability and user productivity look like they’ll keep the product on the right trajectory. At $79 I think it is a bargain and justifies its cost in hours or days of use. It doesn’t necessarily replace all of the other tools in my mockup toolbox – to get to the finer level of detail I still need to break out the HTML occasionally – but this is now usually something that happens only after I’ve validated the basic design with Balsamiq.
Rating: 8/10
Posted on November 23rd, 2008 in Music, Web Development by Greg
My friend Michael Ross is a musician and he sent me an email with a couple of the songs he recorded recently. I asked him if he would like me to put together a simple web page for his songs so that he didn’t have to send out emails with large attachments, and a week or so later we had a new site up and running for him – www.michaelrossmusic.net. He wanted a page that listed the albums, had links to download mp3 songs, and a way for people to listen to the songs without downloading them. I had used SoundManager 2 previously to have mp3s play on a page, so I knew that it would be a good fit.
I wanted to be able to build a simple page with regular links to the mp3 files and for JavaScript to do the magic of making the songs playable in the browser – this post explains how I made it happen. SoundManager 2 is a JavaScript library built on top of Flash – the music plays through Flash (which has much better audio support than browsers), but everything is controlled via JavaScript. I also used Prototype as a framework to build out the functionality.
Here’s what I did:
- Created a simple page with links to mp3 files
- Added a SoundManager handler so that as soon as it loads it instantiates PagePlayer, a JavaScript class I created
- PagePlayer takes a CSS selector as input (and optionally an options object) and identifies all of the links that match the selector – ‘a.mp3Link’ in this case (all links with the class ‘mp3Link’).
- For each of the identified links, PagePlayer creates a SoundManager sound object using the link to the mp3, adds a play button just prior to the song link, creates event handlers for the play button and sound object, and stores the song in a hash
- The event handlers take care of all of the logic: playing songs, making sure that only a single song is playing, changing the state of the button from play to stop
Here’s a current snapshot of the script:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
| PagePlayer = Class.create({
songCount: 0,
songs: new Hash(),
nowPlaying: null,
options: null,
initialize: function(selector, options) {
this.options = {
imgPath: 'images/',
imgPlay: 'control_play.png',
imgStop: 'control_stop.png',
mp3LinkTitle: 'Download song'
};
Object.extend(this.options, options || {});
$$(selector).each(this.addSong,this);
},
addSong: function(mp3Link) {
mp3Link.title = this.options.mp3LinkTitle;
var songId = mp3Link.identify();
var soundObj = soundManager.createSound({
id: songId,
url: mp3Link.href,
onfinish: this.finishHandler.bind(this,songId)
});
var controlBtn = new Element('img',{
src: this.options.imgPath + this.options.imgPlay,
className: 'audioControl'
});
mp3Link.insert({before: controlBtn});
controlBtn.observe('click', this.toggleHandler.bind(this,songId));
this.songs.set(songId, {
controlBtn: controlBtn,
soundObj: soundObj
});
this.songCount++;
},
toggleHandler: function(songId) {
var oldSong = this.nowPlaying;
var newSong = this.songs.get(songId);
if(oldSong) {
oldSong.soundObj.stop();
oldSong.controlBtn.src = this.options.imgPath + this.options.imgPlay;
if(oldSong === newSong) {
this.nowPlaying = null;
return;
}
}
newSong.controlBtn.src = this.options.imgPath + this.options.imgStop;
newSong.soundObj.play();
this.nowPlaying = newSong;
},
finishHandler: function() {
this.nowPlaying.controlBtn.src = this.options.imgPath + this.options.imgPlay;
this.nowPlaying = null;
}
}); |
And on the page it is started up as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
| <script src="js/soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js"></script>
<script src="js/pagePlayer.js"></script>
<script>
soundManager.url = '';
soundManager.onload = function() {
new PagePlayer('a.mp3Link');
};
</script> |
It’s not the prettiest code, but it gets the job done in 1.58 KB of code and works at least in recent versions of Firefox, IE, Safari, and Chrome. So, if you need to add some mp3s to a page, check out SoundManager 2 – it’s easy to use, well documented, and super flexible…
Posted on October 19th, 2008 in Uncategorized by Greg
Its been a long time since I’ve written anything here…mostly due to a very busy year which included Yenari and me getting married in June. I’ll try my best to be more active (i.e. more than one post a year), but for now, I’ll just provide a link to a little experiment I put together from some pictures from our honeymoon in the Cook Islands. It’s a little slideshow-like page, built with JavaScript:
Walking into the Ocean
Nothing too crazy on the JavaScript side – just playing around with some stuff I hadn’t done before. I wrote about three quarters of this a few months ago and just finished it off this afternoon. I had to write a simple, but hopefully effective, image preloader that has nice callbacks and a decent api. The actual slideshow could be written better, but it works, and that’s all I was going for…
Posted on December 3rd, 2007 in Web Development by Greg
I just put together my first simple website for my new toy – my iPhone. It is a simple iPhone-specific interface for Yelp, my favorite source for restaurant and other local reviews. They have a ton of reviews for just about every local restaurant so I find myself using it all the time to find new restaurants to go to or to find more info about restaurants I already know. I could access the website just fine already on my phone, but it was a bit crowded and difficult to navigate on a small screen, so I decided it take this as a challenge to build my first iPhone web interface.
And yes, I’m probably about the 58th person to build a Yelp interface for the iPhone, but I was looking for something I’d actually use and learn from!
Yelp provides a REST search API that allows you to pass in a location and a search term and they return a JSON object with a list of matching businesses, their ratings, and the business info. I used the Zend Framework and the Prototype JavaScript library to put it together. I could have done a pure JavaScript implementation using script hacks, but figured it’d be better to have the PHP code serve as a basic proxy for the Yelp web service.
Try it out!
Posted on November 24th, 2007 in PHP by Greg
Looooong time since I’ve written anything here – about 9 months! This time around I’ve put together a simple PHP5 class for communicating with the Defensio web service. Defensio has an example PHP class, but unfortunately it is PHP4 only and it’s more fun to rewrite it, right?
For those who don’t know about Defensio, it is a web service for determining whether a comment on a blog or message in an application is spam. To use it, you must first register for an API key. Defensio is very similar to the venerable Akismet (see the article I wrote on Akismet) but they provide a couple other features such an indication of the ’spaminess’ of an individual message. Akismet has worked out great for me (123,419 spam comments caught so far!), but I figured it would be good to try out something new as well.
The class is a PHP5 class and the public methods are reasonably well commented. The bottom of this post has a link to a test application and a download of the class/test application. So…the usage of this class is quite straightforward, as shown below:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
| require('library/Gregphoto/Defensio.php');
require('library/Gregphoto/Defensio/Adapter/Streams.php);
$apiKey = 'mysecretapikey';
$siteUrl = 'http://my.secret.site.url.com';
$defensio = new Gregphoto_Defensio($apiKey,$siteUrl);
$defensio->setHttpClient(new Gregphoto_Defensio_Adapter_Streams());
$params = array(
'user-ip' => $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'],
'article-date' => '2007/11/24',
'comment-author' => 'Big Bad Spammer',
'comment-type' => 'comment',
'comment-content' => 'please click links and buy viagra',
'comment-author-email' => 'bigbadspammer@annoying.com',
'comment-author-url' => 'http://www.annoying.com'
);
$result = $defensio->audit_comment($params);
if($result['spam'] == 'true') {
echo "Comment is spam with a spam score of " . $result['spaminess'];
} else {
echo "Comment is not spam";
} |
A couple key points on usage:
- Each Gregphoto_Defensio object requires an Http adapter that it will use to make Http POST requests to the Defensio web service. I originally hardcoded it to use the Zend_Http_Client from the Zend Framework, but figured this could discourage people from using it. Then I wrote up a quick adapter to use PHP’s Http Stream Wrappers, but realized that didn’t work on my Dreamhost account, so I added in an extra one for the Curl extension. In theory I should have added a Gregphoto_Defensio_Adapter_Interface class, but I was lazy and didn’t want to add in an extra file.
- Each Gregphoto_Defensio object can be used to make many requests
- All of the current Defensio API’s are covered by the class. These are covered by the following methods in the Gregphoto_Defensio class:
- validate_key
- announce_article
- audit_comment
- report_false_negatives
- report_false_positives
- get_stats
- Each of these methods takes a single parameter, an associative array of options as defined by the Defensio API. Each API also returns an associative array of response parameters. Two static utility methods Gregphoto_Defensio::getActions (returns a list of defensio methods such as ‘validate-key’) and Gregphoto_Defensio::getActionDetails (returns a list of required parameters, optional parameters, and response parameters for a specific Defensio action) are provided in order to get the details of the input and output parameters.
I created a simple test application which can be used to test Gregphoto_Defensio and all of the APIs provided by Defensio.
Download the Gregphoto_Defensio class and the test application
|